Wednesday, 29 March 2017

Carried West; Bending East.

The incomparable Donne was travelling towards Exeter on Good Friday 1613. What a tortuous journey that must have been?

He was stricken by conscience that he was not in a more sanctified place, nor undertaking what his soul and religious duty demanded. Perhaps to compensate, his mind took to sacred subjects which either then or later, found expression in this timeless poem.

He was heading west so both actually and metaphorically he was 'turning his back' on the East and the geographical location of Christ's crucifixion, commemorated on that very day perhaps one thousand, five hundred and eighty years before.

Donne is writing at a pivotal time for western man's view of Christian belief and of his place in the cosmos, and here Donne alludes to both.

It was written a mere two years after the matter of 'heliocentrism' - that the sun was at the centre of the universe rather than the earth - was investigated by the Roman Inquisition which concluded that it was "foolish and absurd". The theory propounded by Galileo Galilei, subsequently forced to recant on pain of torture and death by the Roman Inquisition.

But it was also almost a century (1517 - note the current anniversary) since Martin Luther nailed his ninety-five theses to the door of Wittenberg Cathedral, that had a profound effect on Christian dogma.

So by the time Donne wrote his poem the Christian man's view of himself and his place in the cosmos was under-going fundamental change, with much wider consequences for the enquiring mind and rational thought.

Donne has his feet firmly placed in traditional theology within the context of the newer cosmology. For him the events of the original 'Good Friday' combine the two, for not only does he believe that Christ's crucifixion and death was the miraculous and divine solution to the human moral condition, the Creator confirmed it with geological, meteorological and astronomical signs and wonders. Thus in that historic moment the physical and spiritual worlds were fused to secure man's salvation from sin and destruction.

With the passage of more than four hundred years, such views may have fallen out of academic favour, but they still resonate powerfully with the human condition, and those twin demons that wrack the human mind, namely guilt and the desire for atonement.

So in literally turning his back on Jerusalem and the remembrance of Christ's sufferings on that momentous day, he admits his own culpability to sin and its consequences and offers up his own for correction, no doubt familiar with the Old Testament words, "For he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed."

Would that world leaders could do a similar journey west this coming Easter time. They have much to seek repentence and chastisement for, as do we all.

Good Friday, 1613. Riding Westward

Related Poem Content Details

Let mans Soule be a Spheare, and then, in this, 
The intelligence that moves, devotion is, 
And as the other Spheares, by being growne 
Subject to forraigne motion, lose their owne, 
And being by others hurried every day, 
Scarce in a yeare their naturall forme obey: 
Pleasure or businesse, so, our Soules admit 
For their first mover, and are whirld by it. 
Hence is't, that I am carryed towards the West 
This day, when my Soules forme bends toward the East. 
There I should see a Sunne, by rising set, 
And by that setting endlesse day beget; 
But that Christ on this Crosse, did rise and fall, 
Sinne had eternally benighted all. 
Yet dare I'almost be glad, I do not see 
That spectacle of too much weight for mee. 
Who sees Gods face, that is selfe life, must dye; 
What a death were it then to see God dye? 
It made his owne Lieutenant Nature shrinke, 
It made his footstoole crack, and the Sunne winke. 
Could I behold those hands which span the Poles, 
And tune all spheares at once peirc'd with those holes? 
Could I behold that endlesse height which is 
Zenith to us, and our Antipodes, 
Humbled below us? or that blood which is 
The seat of all our Soules, if not of his, 
Made durt of dust, or that flesh which was worne 
By God, for his apparell, rag'd, and torne? 
If on these things I durst not looke, durst I 
Upon his miserable mother cast mine eye, 
Who was Gods partner here, and furnish'd thus 
Halfe of that Sacrifice, which ransom'd us? 
Though these things, as I ride, be from mine eye, 
They'are present yet unto my memory, 
For that looks towards them; and thou look'st towards mee, 
O Saviour, as thou hang'st upon the tree; 
I turne my backe to thee, but to receive 
Corrections, till thy mercies bid thee leave. 
O thinke mee worth thine anger, punish mee, 
Burne off my rusts, and my deformity, 
Restore thine Image, so much, by thy grace, 
That thou may'st know mee, and I'll turne my face.

Tuesday, 28 March 2017

Examples of Mossad covert activity in France and Britain. Just the tip of an Iceberg?

Motto: "By way of deception thou shalt do war"

"It is out of love for Israel as a free and just country that I am laying my life on the line by so doing, facing up to those who took it upon themselves to turn the Zionist dream into the present-day nightmare. The Mossad, being the intelligence body entrusted with the responsibility of plotting the course for the leaders at the helm of the nation, has betrayed that trust. Plotting on its own behalf, and for petty, self-serving reasons, it has set the nation on a collision course with all-out war"
Excerpt from ex-Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky's, "By way of deception". See:

The attempt by a Mossad agent to "take down" a British Minister of the Crown and other political figures critical of Israel has been well publicised (see: but this is probably just the tip of an iceberg of infiltration and cooperation between Western and Israeli Intelligence services. 

Where 'friendly cooperation' has strayed into active 'infiltration' by compromising or recruiting Secret Service agents of European States to actually work for Israel primarily, is illustrated in a recent French case. 

We can take it for granted that most of this activity never reaches the public arena but we may well be seeing its practical results in what is called "ISIS Terrorism" and the in the shaping of both domestic and foreign policy. 

Perhaps in the light of just these two recent events in France and Britain the public, Parliament, Government and its agencies should be far more aware that behind the scenes, Israel is actively attempting to subvert and influence domestic events to influence public opinion and government policies. 

Some might take the view that it has been very effective in its aim, with disastrous consequences for our constitution and way of conducting ourselves. Somehow people must learn that the anti-Russian propaganda may actually be a ploy to distract from the real enemies of the State.

See also:

FRANCE – Mossad tried to infiltrate French intelligence services

From "The Ugly Truth" here:

YNET – The Israeli Mossad allegedly tried to infiltrate the French intelligence services by trying to recruit double agents during a joint operation to learn more about Syria’s chemical weapons program, French newspaper Le Monde reported on Sunday.

According to the paper, from 2010 to 2012, Israeli and French intelligence agencies carried out a joint operation codenamed “Ratafia.”

Several Mossad agents operating under false names were reportedly sent to Paris in an effort to recruit a Syrian engineer with vital information about Syrian President Bashar Assad’s chemical weapons arsenal.

According to Le Monde, Mossad succeeded in recruiting the Syrian engineer. He reportedly provided Israel with the information it needed to prove that the Syrians were exploiting their scientific cooperation with the European Union to further develop their chemical weapons. This led the EU in 2011 to cancel its cooperation agreement with Syria.

The Ratafia operation was led by the head of the Mossad station in Paris, identified in the Le Monde report only by the initials D.K.

The French General Directorate for Internal Security (DGSI) claimed that D.K. took advantage of his daily contact with French agents to form closer ties with them, with one French agent being photographed arriving at D.K.’s home for Shabbat dinner.

The same agent told his superiors he was going to Dubai with his family on vacation, but instead went to Israel to meet with Mossad agents in Jerusalem.

Suspicions also arose that the French agent received gifts and cash during that time in violation of the agency’s internal rules.

The French intelligence agencies saw this as a red line that was crossed between friendship among colleagues and an illegitimate attempt to recruit agents.

The heads of the French intelligence agencies filed a complaint with their counterparts in Mossad, resulting in the Mossad station chief D.K. and another Israeli diplomat being sent back to Israel. They have since left the Mossad and are now in the private sector.

Le Monde reported that several of the French agents who participated in the Ratafia operation are expected to lose their security clearance and be transferred to another agency.

The Mossad’s alleged recruiting efforts were discovered when another French agency, entrusted with information security, photographed the French agents with their Israeli counterparts.

The information about this top secret operation was made public as part of an ongoing judicial investigation against Bernard Squarcini, who at the time headed the internal French intelligence agency DGSI.

Squarcini said in his questioning that he was informed by French security services that a “service provider was fraternizing too closely with former French agents who were part of a joint operation with the Mossad. This was likely an attempt by the Mossad to infiltrate French intelligence services.”

According to Squarcini, he came across the two Israelis suspected of trying to recruit the French agents again “by chance” when they returned to France on business.

French authorities are now seeking to question the two former Mossad agents.

Report suggests Israel behind attempt to hack into French communication network


U.S. officials deny involvement in May 2012 cyber attack on Elysee Palace, hinting that Mossad was responsible for attempt, according to leaked document published by Le Monde.

The Mossad may have been involved in an attempt to hack into the former French president’s communications network, AFP reported on Friday, citing a leaked U.S. intelligence document obtained by the French daily Le Monde.
According to the report, France believed that the U.S. was behind the May 2012 cyber attack on the Élysée Palace. But the U.S. National Security Agency denied having anything to do with the hacking, hinting instead that the Israeli intelligence agency may have been responsible for it.
The statements were detailed in the latest note to emerge from the documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. Parts of the note were published by Le Monde.
According to the report, the document was prepared earlier this year to brief NSA officials who were set to meet with senior French intelligence figures to discuss the attempt to breach the Elysee’s communication system.
The document reportedly said that the NSA branch which handles cyber attacks, Tailored Access Operations (TAO), denied carrying out the attack. The U.S.’ closest allies – Australia, Britain, Canada and New Zealand – also said they were not involved.
The note went on to say: “TAO intentionally did not ask either Mossad or [Israel’s cyber intelligence unit] ISNU whether they were involved as France is not an approved target for joint discussions.”
The Le Monde report viewed this sentence as an ironic reference to the likelihood that Mossad was responsible for the hacking.
The attempted breach took place in the final weeks of Nicolas Sarkozy’s term as president.
The leak comes amid a flurry of allegations that U.S. intelligence spied on governments of various countries.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel demanded on Thursday that the United States strike a “no-spying” agreement with Berlin and Paris by the end of the year, saying alleged espionage against two of Washington’s closest EU allies had to be stopped.
Speaking after talks with EU leaders that were dominated by allegations that the NSA had accessed tens of thousands of French phone records and monitored Merkel’s private mobile phone, the chancellor said she wanted action from U.S. President Barack Obama, not just apologetic words.
The United States has a “no-spying” deal with Britain, Australia, New Zealand and Canada, an alliance known as “Five Eyes” that was struck in the aftermath of World War Two.

Israel Flagged as Top Spy Threat to U.S. in New Snowden/NSA Document


Israel was singled out in 2007 as a top espionage threat against the U.S. government, including its intelligence services, in a newly published National Security Agency (NSA) document obtained by fugitive leaker Edward Snowden, according to a news report Monday.

The document also identified Israel, along with North Korea, Cuba and India, as a “leading threat” to the infrastructure of U.S. financial and banking institutions.

The threats were listed in the NSA’s 2007 Strategic Mission List, according to the document obtained by journalist/activist Glenn Greenwald, a founding editor of The Intercept, an online magazine that has a close relationship with Snowden, a former NSA and CIA contractor who fled the U.S. with thousands of top-secret documents last year.

In this new document, Israel was identified by the NSA as a security threat in several areas, including “the threat of development of weapons of mass destruction” and “delivery methods (particularly ballistic and nuclear-capable cruise missiles).” The NSA also flagged Israel’s “WMD and missile proliferation activities” and “cruise missiles” as threats.

In a section of the document headed “Foreign Intelligence, Counterintelligence; Denial & Deception Activities: Countering Foreign Intelligence Threats,” Israel was listed as a leading perpetrator of “espionage/intelligence collection operations and manipulation/influence operations…against U.S. government, military, science & technology and Intelligence Community” organs.

The term “manipulation/influence operations” refers to covert attempts by Israel to sway U.S. public opinion in its favor. In this, Israel has dubious company, according to the NSA: Other leading threats were listed as China, Russia, Cuba, Iran, Pakistan, North Korea, France, Venezuela and South Korea.

Israel has similar company in threats against U.S. infrastructure, according to the NSA document. Under a section headed “Mastering Cyberspace and Preventing an Attack on U.S. Critical Information Systems,” Israel, India, North Korea and Cuba are identified as “FIS [financial/banking system] threats.” Israel also appears on the list of countries believed by the NSA to be “enabling” electronic warfare “producers/proliferators.”

The new document again underscores the schizoid relationship between the U.S. and Israel, which cooperate closely in military and intelligence operations but also aggressively spy on each other. A previously released Snowden document said that “one of NSA’s biggest threats is actually from friendly intelligence services, like Israel.” Another revealed that a U.S. National Intelligence Estimate ranked Israel as “the third most aggressive intelligence service against the U.S.,” behind only China and Russia.

In a series of articles last May,Newsweek reported that “Israel has been caught carrying out aggressive espionage operations against American targets for decades,” an allegation vociferously denied by Israeli officials, who insisted that Jerusalem stopped spying on the U.S. after the late 1980s arrest and conviction of its secret agent Jonathan Pollard, a U.S. Naval Intelligence analyst. Over the weekend, the German magazine Der Spiegelreported that Israel eavesdropped on Secretary of State John Kerry’s cellphone conversations during Middle East peace talks in 2013. (According to a July 20, 2014, piece in The New Republic, “The Kerry team spoke more carefully over cell phones, believing the Israelis might be listening.”)

The State Department had no comment on the Der Spiegel allegations.

Washington’s protective relationship toward Israel is heavily influenced by its close cooperation in intelligence operations against common Middle Eastern threats, such as Iran, Syria, terrorist groups and the Palestinians.

Citing NSA documents, Greenwald’s piece in The Intercept says, “The relationship has, on at least one occasion, entailed the covert payment of a large amount of cash to Israeli operatives.” The NSA and its British counterpart also “rely on U.S.-supported Arab regimes, including the Jordanian monarchy and even the Palestinian Authority Security Forces, to provide vital spying services regarding Palestinian targets.

“Over the last decade,” Greenwald added, “the NSA has significantly increased the surveillance assistance it provides to its Israeli counterpart, the Israeli SIGINT National Unit (ISNU; also known as Unit 8200), including data used to monitor and target Palestinians. In many cases, the NSA and ISNU work cooperatively with the British and Canadian spy agencies, the GCHQ and CSEC.”

Zygier ‘discussed plea bargain with mother hours before his suicide’


“It is not known precisely what was said” in the call, the report in Yedioth Ahronoth noted, adding that Zygier’s parents had been kept fully informed on the circumstances of their son’s arrest and had been shown “the grave indictment which had been served against him.” Zygier knew that if he did not agree to the plea bargain, he would likely be jailed “for a lot longer” than 10 years, the report said.
The Yedioth report traced Zygier’s service in the Mossad, noting that he applied for a post with the intelligence service in a faxed application in response to a Mossad “wanted” advertisement. It said the intelligence organization’s failure to recognize that he was not an appropriate recruit constituted “a crushing failure” of the Mossad’s evaluation process. That process was now being urgently reviewed by the Mossad, the report said, in order “to learn the necessary lessons” to prevent repeat occurrences.
The lengthy Yedioth report Friday mirrored parts of news stories from late last month in the Sydney Morning Herald which detailed Zygier’s years of frustration and failure in the Mossad, culminating in what was described as “one of the most serious security breaches in Israeli history”: He failed to make headway obtaining information from European companies trading with Iran. He spoke indiscreetly about his Mossad service while studying for a Master’s degree while on a leave of absence in Australia in 2009. And, most critically, in an effort to prove his usefulness, he broke regulations and initiated a rogue operation in which tried to recruit a man linked to Hezbollah as a double agent.
After his arrest in early 2010, the Sydney newspaper reported on March 25, “Zygier broke down and admitted that sometime in 2008, before he took his leave of absence and moved to Australia, he had flown to eastern Europe to meet with a man he knew to have close links with Hezbollah with the intention of turning that person into a double agent. Instead, the man reported the recruitment attempt to Beirut, and himself began playing the same game as Zygier, except in reverse. Without Zygier’s knowledge, the man was reporting every detail of his contact with Zygier back to the Hezbollah leadership in Beirut. Israeli officials believe that even [Hezbollah chief Sheikh Hassan] Nasrallah himself was being kept informed.”
When this man asked Zygier for proof that he was a real Mossad agent, “Zygier readily complied and began supplying him with real intelligence from Tel Aviv, including the names of Ziad al-Homsi and Mustafa Ali Awadeh, Mossad’s two top informants in Lebanon.” The two were reportedly arrested by Hezbollah and sentenced to 15 years in jail for spying for Israel.
“When Zygier was arrested, he was also found carrying a compact disc with additional classified information” which Israeli officials “believe he was also preparing to hand over to the other side,” last month’s report said.
At some point, an Israeli official told the Sydney newspaper, “Zygier crossed a red line and went to the dark side… Israeli informants have certainly changed sides in the past. But a regular Mossad employee has never done what Zygier did. It is a bitter defeat for Mossad, but for Hezbollah it is one of the rare instances in which an Arab intelligence service prevailed over its Jewish counterpart.”
The Zygier affair made international headlines in February, when details of his clandestine incarceration and later suicide finally emerged, over two years after he took his own life in an isolated cell in Israel. Before that, there were rumors in the Israel media regarding a mysterious “Prisoner X,” who was being held under absolute secrecy in the Ayalon prison.
According to a Der Spiegel report last month, Zygier was sent to Europe in 2005 to infiltrate companies that were dealing directly with Iran. Zygier’s mission was to try to gain access to potential informants in Iran and Syria. However, after two years, during which he was employed in the accounting division of a company, Zygier was recalled to Israel without having achieved substantial results.
Zygier, disappointed, was assigned a desk job but still hoped to find his way back into the field, Der Spiegel reported. Acting on his own initiative, he began trying to recruit informants in Lebanon to spy on Hezbollah. The affiliate of the group who turned the tables on him was based in a Balkan state.
Zygier, who was 34 and married with two children, took his own life by hanging himself with a bed sheet in the shower of his cell.

German journalist Richard Gutjahr, 42, who filmed the scene unfold, said: 'I stood on the balcony, right on the Promenade des Anglais, and saw how people celebrated there, and how suddenly a truck drove through the crowd,' he told AFP on Friday.
Local reporter Richard Gutjahr described the scene at the shopping center as something "out of a bad movie," with the shopping center completely surrounded by police, a helicopter overhead, and police carrying semi-automatic rifles. Gutjahr was not able to confirm reports of deaths or injuries.
Richard Gutjahr who filmed the Nice France Bastille Day Staged attack is married to Mossad agent and Knesset member Einat Wilf. To quote Mossad agent Richard Gutjahr this video is like something "out of a bad movie"

Brussels Terror Attack and Mossad Connection

Yesterday, I broke the story that the Rivas, an Israeli couple murdered in the Brussels Jewish museum terror attack, worked for agencies with connections to Israeli intelligence.  Miriam worked for the Mossad and Emanuel for Nativ, a unit that encourages aliyah from Eastern European countries (including Russia).  Thanks to reader Bluebird, who discovered that the Israeli embassy website in Germany lists Miriam Riva as an “attache” who worked there since 2007.  My Israeli source informed me that they were both accountants.

Brussels Airport Panic Terror Evacuation filmed by Israeli 'Journalist'
Excerpt: "Please note I am only referring to item of I-phone evidence, but you will see it widely used over and over again in all the media outlets. It is of crowds running in panic away from the Brussels Airport complex. It is very typical of 'terror inducing' footage recorded previously. 

The 'YouTube' footage is 11 seconds worth from 0.22 - 33 seconds only (and this too is very typical of such material) at However there is enough there to see it is filmed from what appears to be a multi-storie car park, so of course we must pose the usual questions who filmed it, why were they in that particular location at the time, and how did it so quickly, in a matter of mere hours, go viral throughout the media?

What we discover is that this was not just an ordinary 'member of the public' who just happened to manage to capture a dramatic scene, but a very specialized person who apparently works for the Israeli online news channel @i24news_EN  - a Ms Anna Ahronheim! 

Now how unlikely is that to happen by pure chance?

Not only so the said person, who makes no secret of her authorship on her twitter feed (below) has also been an outspoken pro-Jewish/anti-Muslim activist in French Canada for the organisation "B'nai B'rith"! 

"B'nai B'rith International ("Children of the Covenant") is the oldest Jewish service organization in the world. B'nai B'rith states that it is committed to the security and continuity of the Jewish People and the State of Israel and combating anti semitism and bigotry." Source: WIKI. All confirmatory details below come from her own public sources.

So we may conclude an active and committed propagandist and agent of an Israeli news organisation, just happened to be in a critical location, just at the moment that terrified crowds fled from the scene of the Brussels airport bombing and was able to capture just eleven seconds of panic before turning it off and sending it all round the world with her name on. 

Now given all the possible imponderables, how likely would that be unless she was positioned and ready for the event to take place? Perhaps Ms Ahronheim would like to tell us?

Threats to Jewish Institutions around the world actually originated in Israel

The Israeli-American teenager suspected of being behind the recent bomb threats to JCCs and other American Jewish institutions reportedly made more than 1,000 threatening phone calls over the past two years. 

Israeli police only managed to zero in on the suspect after US President Donald Trump sent a team of 12 FBI agents to Israel in recent weeks, Haaretz reported. The report did not specify what the FBI agents managed to do that their local counterparts could not.

The suspect, who lives in the southern Israeli city of Ashkelon, is refusing to talk to authorities and police have still not managed to access his computers.

While the youth had apparently been making bomb threats for over two years, the urgency in apprehending him increased following a spate of threats to Jewish community centers in the US.

Police sources told Haaretz that that was in part because the suspect would monitor media reports after he’d call in a threat — to gauge the scale of its impact. If he noticed that it was receiving considerable media attention, he would continue making threats in that same location.

Several of the JCCs and Jewish organizations received multiple threats. However, police believe that the number of bomb threats he phoned in was much greater than was known to the public, as many went unreported.

Monday, 27 March 2017

The global terrorist scam
Terrorist isn't anything other than a sobriquet, a meaningless, but convenient, nickname for anyone who does something, or might do something, against society or the state. It exists on a par with yob, layabout and hooligan. It is a lazy and deceitful term brought into play by George W Bush in his bogus 'war on terror' who first used it on 20 September 2001 after 9/11.

Terrorist means anyone and no one, and has been used ever since 9/11 for indiscriminate killing absent of any evidence. A drone strike on a terrorist cell tells us absolutely nothing other than it is a group so labelled by politicians with deceitful intent. It means huge profits for the military industrial complex and misery for everyone else at an estimated cost (over a decade) of '$4.4 trillion to western tax payers' and has not made a single person safer but has made the entire world less safe.

The war on terror is a war against an enemy or enemies unknown who may or may not represent a threat to western interests and who may or may not commit acts of terror, it is a war without end because it has no meaning in real terms. lacking entirely in specifics.

Terrorism is a political ideology, like austerity, and both serve a dishonest political agenda.

The recent incident in London was called a terrorist attack within minutes, which was all that was required to set the world ablaze. The Police have since reported that 'Khalid Masood (now named but unknown at the time) acted entirely alone for reasons that may never be known'.

Anyone who uses the term terrorist is participating in a monstrous public relations scam, it is a triumph of public manipulation by unscrupulous politicians and specifically George W Bush and the hawks who surrounded him.

The war on terror is primarily a war for profits, and arms and security industries have flourished since 9/11 and they are just the tip of an enormous iceberg of rapacious corporate greed for global resources.

But the war on terror is first and foremost an ideological war of words, of public manipulation and psychological distortion. It is an aggressive war prosecuted by the powerful, including the media, over the lives of ordinary people. Our best weapon in this war is resistance and calling it for what it is, a scam perpetrated by corrupt politicians and liars with vested interests in its continuation.

KOG. 26 March 2017

Christian Zionism Road-map to Armegeddon The Rev. Dr. Stephen Sizer

Friday, 24 March 2017

Westminster Attack!

Westminster attack map

Great and genuine sympathy to all those who may have been killed or injured in this attack.

Far from finished piece but will put it up anyway whilst it is still topical. You will have to fill in the gaps and do the editing yourselves!

Since Nice, suspicious consistency of method quite different to that expected of a true terrorist organisation. Here's just one recent American example. This is gesture terrorism.


Ohio State attacker was Somali, US official says

Posted: Nov 28, 2016 3:18 PM GST

"Authorities say a man purposely ploughed his car over a curb and into pedestrians on Monday morning before jumping out of the car and attacking people with a butcher knife. A police officer who was nearby because of an earlier gas leak was on the scene in a minute and shot and killed the attacker.
The FBI and other agencies joined the investigation.
Authorities say nine people were hurt, one of them critically."


A question arises how the following still from a video was possible  and by whom given the fact that the incident began only seconds before with no advance warning? Fore knowledge is a very good indicator of responsibility.


"Abu Izzadeen named as suspect in London terrorist attack." Source:

London Attacker Was Reportedly Identified As Abu Izzadeen, But There's A Problem: He's Still In Jail.

Note knife in bottom left hand corner. Hard to see but no obvious evidence of blood stain.

Man on a stretcher at Westminster

The following appears to be a still from CCTV showing two groups of emergency workers tending the two injured parties - the assailant in the background (note policeman pointing automatic rifle) and what we must assume is the injured policeman in the foreground, there being no others. The quality of this image is not great but that is not the problem. It seems to me that there is an unexplained inconsistency with other images of the scene. How could the image have been reversed? See images below.

So now we have much better images from the same direction but note how the one above is laterally reversed. How and why has this occurred? There is an unexplained issue of how the individual got past the security on the gate (especially when the country was on a high state of alert) and how the assailant was nearer the entrance gate than his victim? Do we assume from this that he was actually heading back out when he was shot?

In this next image it is clear that the assailant who later died, has been removed whilst the Policeman, now deceased remains in situ. His (?) helmet remains on the kerb to the right. What is rather strange is that the whole crime scene appears to have been totally deserted by police and other emergency services.

A wider view, now flooded with heavily armed policemen (after the horse has bolted some might say) but before the one above. Note, main gates have now been closed!

Clearly the next image was taken before ambulances arrive. Where and why the use of blue surgical gloves by non-medics?


Ambulance crews and police outside the Palace of Westminster

Undoubtedly, as evidenced by this still, there will be CCT coverage of the moment the vehicle crashed into the railings (if it did) In fact given the location and its high security status there are sure multiple versions available to the police. To date none as far as I am aware have been made public. We shall see if they are. Given the circumstances, I can think of no reason why they should not be. Despite the damage to the front of the vehicle, there is no obvious damage to masonry or iron work that might be expected. It should be noted that either the vehicle has come to rest about a metre off the wall or has been pushed back. Other images indicate a person being treated in the space between the two, though apparently surviving the crush as the two fatalities were on Westminster Bridge only. The CCTV referred to above relating to actual moment of the crash, would clarify precisely what happened and in particular what the driver did immediately after he left the SUV and confirm that the man shot in Palace Yard, was in fact the same man that drove the vehicle. At the moment it is an unproven assumption - that may be accurate - that they are one and the same. Note helmeted cyclist in front of vehicle. Strange crime scene with police present.

In the foreground stationary official vehicles. So who is the intriguing hooded individual appearing to be making a hand signal. What is its meaning?

Better image from CCN! Identical moment.*388/London+Attack+4+-+MGN.jpg

Again it is reasonable to ask where is the evidence of damage to pillar or railings from what must have been a collision at speed sufficient to cause the damage to car indicated? We do not appear to have witnesses to the collision or to the driver getting out and walking around the corner before entering without opposition it seems, the Palace Yard.

Here's a very odd image. For some reason an area to the right has been obscured. Why?


PC Keith Palmer

The police officer killed in the attack at Westminster was later named by Scotland Yard as PC Keith Palmer. The 48-year-old husband and father was a member of the Met's parliamentary and diplomatic protection command and had 15 years service. Previously a soldier.

Explaining why he didn’t have a gun despite being charged with guarding Parliament the national lead for Counter Terrorism Policing and the Acting Deputy Commissioner, Mark Rowely, said: “Our parliamentary protection team are a combination of armed and unarmed officers doing different roles, and sadly the officer who lost his life today was unarmed.
“He was supported by armed colleagues who shot and killed the attacker. He (the attacker) tried to enter Parliament and was stopped at the gate.”
Some might think this raises more questions than answers them.

THE HERO (Source:

MP Tobias Ellwood helps at the scene of the stabbing of the police officer

On 22 March 2017, during an attack on Parliament, Ellwood gave mouth-to-mouth resuscitation and CPR to a stabbed police officer even though there were plenty of healthcare professionals around the victim.[11] The police officer was subsequently reported to have died.[12] Ellwood was called a "hero" by those at Westminster and the press, as photos surfaced of him with blood on his face while he crouched over the body of the dying police officer.[13] Jeremy Corbyn, leader of the Opposition, was among the first to pay tribute.[14] John Crace, satirical political sketch writer for The Guardian, wrote that he had seen a man run out from the Parliament buildings to help, immediately after the attack; he didn't recognise him at first, but later found out that it was Ellwood, whom he knew.[15]
This does raise the question as to what he was doing in that immediately vicinity at that time. Presumably he came from the 'Member's Entrance'. Only he can explain the precise circumstances.

Briefly his biography was born in NYC of British parents and after Loughborough University joined the Royal Green Jackets from 1991 to 1996, leaving with the rank of Captain. He then followed a political ambition, unsuccessfully standing as Conservative candidate in 2001 and elected for Bournemouth East in 2005. Thereafter he held various government jobs often connected to military-related Ministers or topics. He was a supporter of David Cameron and immediately placed in the Whips Office on election - clearly an indication he was preferred. Thereafter in 2010, he was appointed PPS to then Defence Secretary Liam Fox, well-known for his Middle East contacts amidst some controversy over arms sales. In October 2011 was appointed PPS to David Lidington, Minister for Europe at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, now Leader of the House.    In  July 2014 Ellwood was appointed as Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. He was a Member of the Parliamentary Delegation to the NATO Assembly, 2014 and Parliamentary Advisor to the Prime Minister for the 2014 NATO Summit. In 2011, Ellwood served on the Special Select Committee set up to scrutinise the Bill which became the Armed Forces Act 2011.[5] He was also a member of the Defence Reform Act 2014 Committee[6] In May 2014 he was one of seven unsuccessful candidates for the chairmanship of the House of Commons Defence Select Committee.[7]

The following image shows Ellwood with what appears to be blood stain or livid graze to forehead

He has something of a reputation for confrontational behaviour. In 2011 referring to the Conservative party rebel Mark Pritchard Ellwood was reported as saying "He should be given a good hiding behind the bike shed". He later claimed he was joking.[2] In 2010 Ellwood was threatened with arrest outside the House of Commons by the police after confronting them over an anti-war protester. Contrary to policy he voted in favour of a 10% increase in pay for MP's in contrast to 1% freeze for rest of public service., 
Dear Lorna, One thing we could all do is not be taken in by the hype and deceit embedded in these events. All is not clear regarding this one but there are many questions that remain to be answered. Like why was the accused man, later found to be still in gaol? Who took the images of the vehicle crossing Westminster Bridge and was it just coincidental they did so in that tiny window of time? Why is there no apparent damage to pillar and railings, yet the assault car is majorly damaged including windscreen shattered? How did a member of the public just saunter into Palace Yard through gates and past policemen without being challenged? Why did he ignore policemen at the gate but stab an officer inside? Why does the offending knife show no signs of blood contamination as far as can be seen? Why if this was a genuine ISIS were not guns and explosives used and more people employed? Why does it follow an identical pattern of recent events on the continent and in Israel? Why are there so many Masonic and Caballistic embedded in the events (even the rescue helicopter was sponsored by mason and carried their logo)? How is it that an ex-military and NATO connected MP was immediately on scene and carried out resuscitation techniques when trained para-medics were available? Why was the death and injured toll mis-represented and had to be corrected down? Why was it necessary to 'lock down' Parliament for so long? Why was security so poor given the high terrorist threat level and most obvious target? How and in what way was the assailant known to MI5 (again) and why if he was known to be a "terrorist sympathiser" were alarm bells not rung when he hired a vehicle? Previous incidents both here and abroad have followed such stereotypical paths as regards the event and the way it is responded to, not to mention consistent proof of involvement by the State of Israel and/or its agents, that it would be naive to think these can be taken wholly at face value. I hope 38 Degrees is aware of this and will do its bit to shed light on a very dark and dangerous process. Yours sincerely, Tim Veater. P.S. You may like to check out these:;;

Mark, I have no special inside information but the coincidences and similarities in this latest outrage are so glaring that it would be naive to ignore them. There is no doubt in my mind that there is an evil caucus - even call it ISIS if you wish - but it is not what it is purported to be. Just as Al Qaedabefore it was a creation of mainly America, ISIS also. So even if the front of ISIS is carrying out attacks we can be sure it is implementing US/Israeli policy and planning. Israel has stated it supports ISIS and this has been proved in military action both by NATO and Israel. Why do you think ISIS has never attacked Israel? Why it has aligned itself against both Palestinians and Iran? Why Putin so pissed off the West? (Answr: Because he was actually fighting ISIS unlike us!) The whole ISIS thing is a sham from start to finish so why should we believe the plank that ISIS is Muslim and behind all these attacks? You will notice half the time the patsies that are put up are drug taking, alcohol drinking, night clubbing promiscuous MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALISTS? Very unlikely to me. In fact the ISIS fighters, led by American trained individuals, are simple mercenaries flooded in by the US from Libya and other places largely for the money. From 9/11 onwards the British people have been subjected to an evil and pernicious hoax that the political elite has signed up to and it it is surely but slowly unravelling and I think they know it. That is what these terror events are about - to spread fear and hatred and to enable them to advance an agenda, which they are doing in tiny steps. Note even here in Cornwall we have been told there will be more armed police patrols because of the Westminster incident! Can you believe it? Yet again this individual alleged to have been the assailant, was known to MI5. Why do they always know them but do nothing to stop them? That is yet another unanswered question I'm afraid.
LikeReplyJust now

Sorry I after all that I didn't answer your specific questions. False flags come in many shapes and sizes. Invariably truth is mixed in with the lies and that is why it is so difficult to tease them apart. Thousands of people were killed on 9/11 and there probably were 19 individuals labelled as "hijackers" but that does not mean that the people blamed were actually the perpetrators. We must never let natural emotions of sympathy or rage colour our judgement because that is what the criminals behind it rely on. Everything might have happened in London exactly as stated, but equally there may be subtle but significant variations that we know nothing about. For example the vehicle that crossed the bridge might not be the vehicle that hit the wall. The vehicle that appears to have hit the wall may not have! The driver of the vehicle might not be the man that was shot. The policeman might not have died from stab wounds. The assailant may have been shot or died from someone other than the policeman. The assailant may have been acting under duress or the influence of some sort of mind control or drug. All of these things are possible and have been documented before. As to Muslims hating us, I'd be rather surprised if they didn't given our past history for at least 20 years. We have killed or facilitated millions of deaths and left civilised countries in ruin. I'm sure you would be sore if you lived abroad and watched it happening here. Considering this they have been very restrained although it has kicked off big time in France - you notice largely ignored by the British media. As to condemning the atrocities - do you mean here or there, and by whom, them or us? We all need to condemn atrocities equally and place the blame where it truly belongs. Which British politician has had the courage to challenge the 9/11 story and place the blame where it truly belongs, with elements of the American and Israeli governments? Who has had the courage to charge Israel with gross violations of human rights. Condemnation of violence from whatever quarter needs to be condemned and by all.

Well I don't think we should be apathetic or indifferent to it and we should be sympathetic to the injured and affected. What I think we should avoid is uncritical acceptance of the official story and the media's treatment of it including what appears to me to be an example of mass hysteria. Why is the response to this so hugely different to the thousands killed and injured on the roads EVERY year, sometimes with the same degree of recklessness or malice? How is it that we get so emotional about three killed but don't turn a hair when thousands were murdered in Gaza by the Israelis who we actively support? It appears so irrational to me but worse it is an active objective of these events as in Paris and elsewhere. Note this is absolutely no use to ISIS but is helpful to our own politicians. Incidentally, ref. to the questions I raised above, the BBC has just revealed that the assailant was not shot by a policeman but by a "bodyguard"! Bodyguard of whom, provided by whom? I think this proves at least part of my argument. Regards.